- #Neat nr 030108 scanner driver driver#
- #Neat nr 030108 scanner driver software#
- #Neat nr 030108 scanner driver tv#
- #Neat nr 030108 scanner driver windows#
# you have loaded a kernel driver for your USB host controller and have setup If you expected something different, make sure that # you have loaded a kernel SCSI driver for your SCSI adapter.Ĭould not open USB device 0x8087/0x8001 at 002:002: Access denied (insufficient permissions)Ĭould not open USB device 0x1d6b/0x0002 at 002:001: Access denied (insufficient permissions)Ĭould not open USB device 0x8087/0x8009 at 001:002: Access denied (insufficient permissions)Ĭould not open USB device 0x1d6b/0x0002 at 001:001: Access denied (insufficient permissions)Ĭould not open USB device 0x1d6b/0x0003 at 004:001: Access denied (insufficient permissions)Ĭould not open USB device 0x046d/0xc24c at 003:004: Access denied (insufficient permissions)Ĭould not open USB device 0x046d/0xc31d at 003:003: Access denied (insufficient permissions)Ĭould not open USB device 0x1d6b/0x0002 at 003:001: Access denied (insufficient permissions) # scanner is powered up and properly connected to your computer. # result is different from what you expected, first make sure your I'll check back later to see what replies I get.Ĭode: Select all # sane-find-scanner will now attempt to detect your scanner.
#Neat nr 030108 scanner driver windows#
I have to switch the scanner back over to my windows box to get some work done. It seems that, per the SANE pages, things aren't where they belong. (ENVIRONMENT) Using printenv can't see evidence that these are set. (FILES) Files listed /usr/lib/sane/libsane-gt68xx.a and /usr/lib/sane/libsane-gt68xx.so don't exist.įound the following in two separate locations /proc/3264/cwd and /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sane Doesn't match what I expected.
#Neat nr 030108 scanner driver software#
(LIBUSB ISSUES) It requested that libusb0.1.8 or later be used I searched Software Manager for libusb-0 (both installed and available) but only libusb-0.1-4 was listed (and installed). If this is the case I'm thinking this should be updated. I searched the file system for gt68xx (scanner backend) and found file(s) with the name /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane/libsane-gt68xx.so.1.0.23 if I am interpreting it correctly does *.1.0.23 refer to version number 1.0-23? Per referenced page the latest release is 1.0-84. I know that 07b3 is the manufacturer ID and 0462 is the model ID.
Lsusb finds the scanner " Bus 003 Device 002: ID 07b3:0462 Plustek, Inc." but " sudo sane-find-scanner" does not. From what I understand from my reading, if you get the backend to recognize the scanner the frontend shouldn't be a problem. So I'm looking for someone who my have forged this river before. I think I know what needs to be done but lack the knowledge to press forward with confidence. I have spent a lot of time reading pages on and to the point I had to take a break. I think it has to do with the backend (yes I'm learning some stuff ) In my poking around I'm thinking that the default LM load is not up to date on the latest backend files. I'm trying to get my Neat scanner to work with Linux.
#Neat nr 030108 scanner driver tv#
Giving the advertising push I see of these Neat scanners on TV I'm hoping someone out there has set up one of these before. I use this scanner on a weekly basis to scan a handful of receipts to store in Quicken. Has anyone gotten the Neat (Model NR-030108) to work in Linux the way it does in its native windows? With native Linux software, not necessarily with the NeatWorks software. However, it does a great job of scanning the receipt, auto adjusting the "exposure"(?), auto cropping, OCR and spitin' out a PDF. The software may work but it is bloated and overkill when you all you do is scan everything to PDF.
However, it's proprietary nature, where it doesn't work with anything but the NeatWorks software, will prevent me from buying another one. To me the Neat scanner (Model NR-030108) is a great little workhorse of a scanner. It has been my experience that either the scanner is great and the software sucks or the scanner sucks and the software is great. I would like to begin by saying that I have never experienced a great combination of hardware (scanner) and accompanying software. I'm experienced with PCs since the DOS days but I'm a major newbie to Linux, I think this is the best place for this.
0 kommentar(er)
